Research Papers

Energy Extraction-Based Robust Linear Quadratic Gaussian Control of Acoustic-Structure Interaction in Three-Dimensional Enclosure

[+] Author and Article Information
F. Liu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: liu.feng@cummins.com

B. Fang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: bfang@hit.edu.cn

A. G. Kelkar

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Iowa State University,
Ames, IA 50011
e-mail: akelkar@iastate.edu

1Present address: former Graduate Student, currently employed as a research scientist for Cummins Inc.

2Present address: former Visiting Scholar, currently with Harbin Institute of Technology, Nan Gang District, Harbin, China, 150001.

3Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Technical Committee on Vibration and Sound of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received August 5, 2003; final manuscript received March 3, 2014; published online May 5, 2014. Assoc. Editor: John A. Main.

J. Vib. Acoust 136(4), 041008 (May 05, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: VIB-03-1054; doi: 10.1115/1.4027206 History: Received August 05, 2003; Revised March 03, 2014

This paper presents an linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG)-based robust control strategy for active noise reduction in a 3D enclosure wherein acoustic-structure interaction dynamics is present. The acoustic disturbance is created by the piezo-actuated vibrating boundary surface of the enclosure. The control signal is generated by the speaker which is noncollocated with the sensing microphone mounted inside the enclosure. The dynamic model of the system is obtained using frequency-domain system identification techniques. The state weighting matrix in the LQG cost function is determined analytically in the closed-form which allows the control designer to directly penalize the total acoustic energy of the system. The robustness of the controller is also ensured to guarantee the closed-loop stability against the unmodeled dynamics and parametric uncertainties. Simulation and experiment results are given which demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control methodology.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of the identified and measured FRF's

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

An LQG optimal control system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Simulated open- and closed-loop frequency response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental open- and closed-loop frequency response

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time response for multitone (225 Hz, 265 Hz, and 290 Hz) disturbance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

3D acoustic enclosure setup in laboratory

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Additive uncertainty of the plant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Standard from of additive uncertainty

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

N-Δ configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

||NYdWd|| ∞ versus frequency




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In