0
Research Papers

Optimal Lumped Mass Matrices by Minimization of Modal Errors for Beam Elements

[+] Author and Article Information
Zhanxuan Zuo

Key Lab of Structures Dynamic and Control,
Ministry of Education,
School of Civil Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Heilongjiang,
Harbin 150090, China

Shuang Li

Assistant Professor
Key Lab of Structures Dynamic and Control,
Ministry of Education,
School of Civil Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Heilongjiang,
Harbin 150090, China
e-mail: shuangli@hit.edu.cn

Changhai Zhai

Professor
Key Lab of Structures Dynamic and Control,
Ministry of Education,
School of Civil Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Heilongjiang,
Harbin 150090, China
e-mail: zch-hit@hit.edu.cn

Lili Xie

Professor
Key Lab of Structures Dynamic and Control,
Ministry of Education,
School of Civil Engineering,
Harbin Institute of Technology,
Heilongjiang,
Harbin 150090, China

1Corresponding authors.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received March 26, 2013; final manuscript received November 22, 2013; published online January 16, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Dr. Corina Sandu.

J. Vib. Acoust 136(2), 021015 (Jan 16, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: VIB-13-1093; doi: 10.1115/1.4026247 History: Received March 26, 2013; Revised November 22, 2013

This paper clarifies the reason why error occurs in the mass lumping procedure and presents a new approach to construct lumped mass matrices for Euler–Bernoulli beam elements, which contain both translational and rotational degrees of freedom. Lumped mass matrices provide the proper translational inertia but change the rotational inertia compared with the continuous mass representation. Therefore, the optimal lumped mass matrices are expressed through the adoption of a variable rotational inertia parameter to counterbalance the decreased or increased rotational inertia. The goal of this study is to propose lumped mass matrices to minimize the modal error for beam elements. The accuracy of the new mass matrices is validated by a number of numerical tests.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Archer, J. S., 1965, “Consistent Matrix Formulation for Structural Analysis Using Finite Element Techniques,” AIAA J., 3(10), pp. 1910–1918. [CrossRef]
Goudreau, G. L. and Taylor, R. L., 1972, “Evaluation of Numerical Integration Methods in the Elastodynamics,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 2(1), pp. 69–97. [CrossRef]
Wu, S. R., 2006, “Lumped Mass Matrix in Explicit Finite Element Method for Transient Dynamics of Elasiticity,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 195(44), pp. 5983–5994. [CrossRef]
Laier, J. E., 2007, “Mass Lumping, Dispersive Properties and Bifurcation of Timoshenko's Flexural Waves,” Adv. Eng. Software, 38(8), pp. 547–551. [CrossRef]
Laier, J. E., 1998, “Hermitian Lumped Mass Matrix Formulation for Flexural Wave Propagation,” Commun. Numer. Methods Eng., 14(1), pp. 43–49 [CrossRef].
Key, S. W. and Beisinger, Z. E., 1971, “The Transient Dynamic Analysis of Thin Shells in the Finite Element Method,” 3rd Conference on Matrix Methods in Structural Mechanics, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, October 19–21.
Li, S., Hu, J. J., Zhai, C. H., and Xie, L. L., 2012, “Static, Vibration and Transient Dynamic Analyses by Beam Element With Adaptive Displacement Interpolation Functions,” Math. Probl. Eng., 2012, pp. 202719 [CrossRef].
Hinton, E., Rock, T., and Zienkiewicz, O. C., 1976, “A Note on Mass Lumping and Related Processes in the Finite Element Method,” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 4(3), pp. 245–249. [CrossRef]
Zienkiewicz, O. C. and Taylor, R. L., 2000, The Finite Element Method: The Basis, 5th ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK.
Pan, W. and Haug, E. J., 1998, “Optimal Inertia Lumping From Modal Mass Matrices for Structural Dynamics,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 163(1), pp. 171–191. [CrossRef]
Pan, W. and Haug, E. J., 1999, “Flexible Multibody Dynamic Simulation Using Optimal Lumped Inertia Matrices,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 173(1), pp. 189–200. [CrossRef]
Archer, G. C. and Whalen, T. M., 2005, “Development of Rotationally Diagonal Mass Matrices for Plate and Beam Elements,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 194(8), pp. 675–689. [CrossRef]
Belytschko, T. and Mindle, W. L., 1980, “Flexural Wave Propagation Behavior of Lumped Mass Approximations,” Comput. Struct., 12(6), pp. 805–812. [CrossRef]
Felippa, C. A., 2013, “Introduction to Finite Element Methods,” Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/cas/courses.d/IFEM.d/
Hansson, P. A. and Saderg, G., 1997, “Mass Matrices by Minimization of Modal Errors,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 40(22), pp. 4259–4271. [CrossRef]
Cook, R. D., Malkus, D. S., Plesha, M. E., and Witt, R. J., 2005, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 4th ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Malkus, D. S. and Plesha, M. E., 1986, “Zero and Negative Masses in Finite Element Vibration and Transient Analysis,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 59(3), pp. 281–306. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Continuous mass beam element, and (b) lumped mass beam element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Rigid body rotation of the beam elements: (a) continuous mass beam element, and (b) lumped mass beam element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flexural rotation of the beam elements: (a) continuous mass beam element, and (b) lumped mass beam element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The first mode shapes: (a) cantilever beam, and (b) simply supported beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

First natural frequency error of a one element model: (a) rigid body rotation dominated beam, and (b) flexural rotation dominated beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

First three mode shapes of the rigid body rotation dominated beam [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

First three natural frequency errors of a 10-element model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Error curves for different element numbers per wavelength for the rigid body rotation dominated beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Frequency error versus the rotational inertia coefficient of different N for the flexural rotation dominated beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Error curves for different element numbers per wavelength for the flexural rotation dominated beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Frequency error versus the rotational inertia coefficient of different N for the rigid body rotation dominated beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Change trend of the optimal rotational inertia coefficient versus the mode number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Frequency error versus the rotational inertia coefficient for N = 10

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In