Eigenvalues and Eigenvalue Sensitivities of a Beam Supported by Viscoelastic Solids

Philip D. Cha; Kyle C. Carbon; Richard Hsieh

doi:10.1115/1.4026175

Journal of Vibration and Acoustics | Volume 136 | Issue 2 | research-article

< Previous Article Next Article >

Research Papers

Eigenvalues and Eigenvalue Sensitivities of a Beam Supported by Viscoelastic Solids

Philip D. Cha ¹, Kyle C. Carbon and Richard Hsieh

[+] Author and Article Information

Philip D. Cha

Professor
Department of Engineering,
Harvey Mudd College,
301 Platt Boulevard,
Claremont, CA 91711
e-mail: philip_cha@hmc.edu

Kyle C. Carbon, Richard Hsieh

Department of Engineering,
Harvey Mudd College,
301 Platt Boulevard,
Claremont, CA 91711

¹Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received June 12, 2013; final manuscript received November 21, 2013; published online January 16, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Michael Leamy.

J. Vib. Acoust 136(2), 021017 (Jan 16, 2014) (16 pages) Paper No: VIB-13-1198; doi: 10.1115/1.4026175 History: Received June 12, 2013; Revised November 21, 2013

Article

References

Figures

Tables

Citing Articles

Abstract

The eigenvalues and the first and second-order eigenvalue sensitivities of a uniform Euler–Bernoulli beam supported by the standard linear solid model for viscoelastic solids are studied in detail. A method is proposed that yields the approximate eigenvalues and allows the formulation of a frequency equation that can be used to obtain approximate eigenvalue sensitivities. The eigenvalue sensitivities are further exploited to solve for the perturbed eigenvalues due to system modifications, using both a first- and second-order Taylor series expansion. The proposed method is easy to formulate, systematic to apply, and simple to code. Numerical experiments consisting of various beams supported by a single or multiple viscoelastic solids validated the proposed scheme and showed that the approximate eigenvalues and their sensitivities closely track the exact results.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Chiba, T., and Kobayashi, H., 1985, “A Study of Modeling the Mechanical Snubber for Dynamic Analysis,” Transactions of the International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Vol. K, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 189–194.

DeJong, R. G., Ermer, G. E., Paydenkar, C. S., and Remtema, T. M., 1998, “High Frequency Dynamic Properties of Rubber Isolation Elements,” Proceedings of Noise-Con'98, Ypsilanti, MI, April 5–8, pp. 383–390.

Shekhar, N. C., Hatwal, H., and Mallik, A. K., 1999, “Performance of Non-linear Isolators and Absorbers to Shock Excitations,” J. Sound Vib., 227(2), pp. 293–307. [CrossRef]

de Haan, Y. M., and Sluimer, G. M., 2001, “Standard Linear Solid Model for Dynamic and Time Dependent Behaviour of Building Materials,” Heron, 46(1), pp. 49–76.

Zhang, J., and Richards, C. M., 2006, “Dynamic Analysis and Parameter Identification of a Single Mass Elastomeric Isolation System Using a Maxwell–Voigt Model,” ASME J. Vibr. Acoust., 128(6), pp. 713–721. [CrossRef]

Kaul, S., 2012, “Dynamic Modeling and Analysis of Mechanical Snubbing,” ASME J. Vibr. Acoust., 134(2), p. 021020. [CrossRef]

Ikhouane, F., and Rodellar, J., 2007, Systems With Hysterisis: Analysis, Identification and Control Using the Bouc-Wen Model, 1st ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Adhikari, S., and Pascual, B., 2009, “Eigenvalues of Linear Viscoelastic Systems,” J. Sound Vib., 325(4–5), pp. 1000–1011. [CrossRef]

Adhikari, S., 2010, “A Reduced Second-Order Approach for Linear Viscoelastic Oscillators,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 77(4), p. 041003. [CrossRef]

Adhikari, S., and Pascual, B., 2011, “Iterative Methods for Eigenvalues of Viscoelastic Systems”, ASME J. Vibr. Acoust., 133(2), p. 021002. [CrossRef]

Lancaster, P., 1964, “On Eigenvalues of Matrices Dependent on a Parameter,” Numer. Math., 6(5), pp. 377–387. [CrossRef]

Fox, R. L., and Kapoor, M. P., 1968, “Rates of Change of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors,” AIAA J., 6(12), pp. 2426–2429. [CrossRef]

Plaut, R. H., and Huseyin, K., 1973, “Derivatives of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors in Non-Self-Adjoint Systems,” AIAA J., 11(2), pp. 250–251. [CrossRef]

Rudisill, C. S., and Chu, Y. Y., 1975, “Numerical Methods for Evaluating the Derivatives of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors,” AIAA J., 13(6), pp. 834–837. [CrossRef]

Adelman, H. M., and Haftka, R. T., 1986, “Sensitivity Analysis for Discrete Structural Systems,” AIAA J., 24(5), pp. 823–832. [CrossRef]

Godoy, L.Taroco, E., and Feijoo, R., 1994, “Second-Order Sensitivity Analysis in Vibration and Buckling Problems,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 37(23), pp. 3999–4014. [CrossRef]

Gürgöze, M., Özgür, K., and Erol, H., 1995, “On the Eigenfrequencies of a Cantilevered Beam With a Tip Mass and In-Span Support,” Comput. Struct., 56(1), pp. 85–92. [CrossRef]

Gürgöze, M., 1998, “On the Sensitivities of the Eigenvalues of a Viscously Damped Cantilever Carrying a Tip Mass,” J. Sound Vib., 216(2), pp. 215–225. [CrossRef]

Vessel, K. N., Ram, Y. M., and Pang, S., 2005, “Sensitivity of Repeated Eigenvalues to Perturbations,” AIAA J., 43(3), pp. 582–585. [CrossRef]

Lee, T. H., 2007, “Adjoint Method for Design Sensitivity Analysis of Multiple Eigenvalues and Associated Eigenvectors,” AIAA J., 45(8), pp. 1998–2004. [CrossRef]

Griffith, D. T., and Miller, A. K., 2009, “Applications of Analytical Sensitivities of Principal Components in Structural Dynamics Analysis,” 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Palm Springs, CA, May 4–7.

Cha, P. D., and Sabater, A. B., 2011, “Eigenvalue Sensitivities of a Linear Structure Carrying Lumped Attachments,” AIAA J., 49(11), pp. 2470–2481. [CrossRef]

Meidav, T., 1964, “Viscoelastic Properties of the Standard Linear Solid,” Geophys. Prospect., 121, pp. 80–99. [CrossRef]

Meirovitch, L., 2001, Fundamentals of Vibrations, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Sherman, J., and Morrison, W. J., 1949, “Adjustment of an Inverse Matrix Corresponding to Changes in the Elements of a Given Column or a Given Row of the Original Matrix,” Ann. Math. Stat., 20, pp. 621.

Golub, G. H., and van Loan, C. F., 1996, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.

Marsden, J. E., and Tromba, A. J., 1988, Vector Calculus, W. H. Freeman, New York.

Gonçalves, P. J. P., Brennan, M. J., and Elliott, S. J., 2007, “Numerical Evaluation of High-Order Modes of Vibration in Uniform Euler-Bernoulli Beams,” J. Sound Vib., 301(3–5), pp. 1035–1039. [CrossRef]

Reddy, J. N., 1993, An Introduction to the Finite Element Method, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Edwards, C. H., and Penney, D. E., 2002, Multivariable Calculus With Matrices, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Figures

Fig. 1

An arbitrarily supported beam with the standard linear solid model for a viscoelastic solid

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 3

A parametric plot displaying λ₁ as a function of τ = c/k2, where c is fixed at three constant values and k₂ is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to c = 1EIρ/L2, c = 2EIρ/L2, and c = 3EIρ/L2.

A parametric plot displaying λ1 as a function of τ = c/k2, where c is fixed at three constant values and k2 is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to c = 1EIρ/L2, c = 2EIρ/L2, and c = 3EIρ/L2.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 11

The imaginary component of λ₁ as k₄₁ is varied for the system of Table 5

The imaginary component of λ1 as k41 is varied for the system of Table 5

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 4

Variations of λ₁ as a function of the time constant τ=c/k2 of the Maxwell element, where k₂ is fixed at three constant values and c is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to k2 = 5EI/L3, k2 = 10EI/L3, and k2 = 15EI/L3.

Variations of λ1 as a function of the time constant τ=c/k2 of the Maxwell element, where k2 is fixed at three constant values and c is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to k2 = 5EI/L3, k2 = 10EI/L3, and k2 = 15EI/L3.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 5

A parametric plot displaying λ₁ as a function of τ = c/k2, where k₂ is fixed at three constant values and c is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to k2 = 5EI/L3, k2 = 10EI/L3, and k2 = 15EI/L3.

A parametric plot displaying λ1 as a function of τ = c/k2, where k2 is fixed at three constant values and c is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to k2 = 5EI/L3, k2 = 10EI/L3, and k2 = 15EI/L3.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 15

The imaginary component λ₁ as x₄ is varied for the system of Table 5

The imaginary component λ1 as x4 is varied for the system of Table 5

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 10

The real component of λ₁ as k₄₁ is varied for the system of Table 5

The real component of λ1 as k41 is varied for the system of Table 5

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 2

Variations of λ₁ as a function of the time constant τ = c/k2 of the Maxwell element, where c is fixed at three constant values and k₂ is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to c = 1EIρ/L2, c = 2EIρ/L2, and c = 3EIρ/L2.

Variations of λ1 as a function of the time constant τ = c/k2 of the Maxwell element, where c is fixed at three constant values and k2 is allowed to vary for the system of Table 1. The three curves correspond to c = 1EIρ/L2, c = 2EIρ/L2, and c = 3EIρ/L2.

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 12

The real component of λ₁ as c₄ is varied for the system of Table 5

The real component of λ1 as c4 is varied for the system of Table 5

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 13

The imaginary component λ₁ as c₄ is varied for the system of Table 5

The imaginary component λ1 as c4 is varied for the system of Table 5

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 14

The real component of λ₁ as x₄ is varied for the system of Table 5

The real component of λ1 as x4 is varied for the system of Table 5

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 6

The real component of λ₁ as k₂ is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

The real component of λ1 as k2 is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 7

The imaginary component of λ₁ as k₂ is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

The imaginary component of λ1 as k2 is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 8

The real component of λ₁ as c is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

The real component of λ1 as c is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Fig. 9

The imaginary component of λ₁ as c is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

The imaginary component of λ1 as c is varied for the system consisting of a cantilever beam with a single viscoelastic solid attachment

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Web of Science® Times Cited: 1

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

PDF
Email

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Return to: Eigenvalues and Eigenvalue Sensitivities of a Beam Supported by Viscoelastic Solids

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Cha PD, Carbon KC, Hsieh R. Eigenvalues and Eigenvalue Sensitivities of a Beam Supported by Viscoelastic Solids. ASME. J. Vib. Acoust. 2014;136(2):021017-021017-16. doi:10.1115/1.4026175.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

Eigenvalues and Eigenvalue Sensitivities of a Beam Supported by Viscoelastic Solids

Abstract

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks