Research Papers

Load Recovery in Components Based on Dynamic Strain Measurements

[+] Author and Article Information
Anoop K. Dhingra

e-mail: dhingra@uwm.edu

Deepak K. Gupta

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin,
Milwaukee, WI 53201

1Corresponding author.

2Currently President, Wolf Star Technologies, 3321 N. Newhall St., Milwaukee, WI 53211, e-mail: tim.hunter@wolfstartech.com.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS. Manuscript received March 5, 2012; final manuscript received April 26, 2013; published online June 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Jean Zu.

J. Vib. Acoust 135(5), 051020 (Jun 18, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: VIB-12-1056; doi: 10.1115/1.4024384 History: Received March 05, 2012; Revised April 26, 2013

This paper presents a modeling approach for estimating time varying loads acting on a component from experimental strain measurements. The strain response of an elastic vibrating system is written as a linear superposition of strain modes. Since the strain modes, as well as the normal displacement modes, are intrinsic dynamic characteristics of a component, the dynamic loads exciting a component are estimated by measuring induced strain fields. The accuracy of the estimated loads depends on a number of factors, such as the placement locations and orientations of the gauges on the instrumented structure, as well as the number of retained modes from strain modal analysis. A solution procedure based on the construction of D-optimal designs is implemented to determine the optimum locations and orientations of strain gauges such that the variance in load estimates is minimized. A numerical as well as an experimental validation of the proposed approach through two example problems is also presented.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Flow chart of the overall solution process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Bent beam with its four modes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Optimum gauge locations and orientations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Load-time history applied at the tip of the beam

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Recovered mode participation factors

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Cantilevered beam with optimum gauge placement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Clamped cantilevered beam mounted on the shaker

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

MPF for a 28 Hz base excitation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Recovered MPF for a 28 Hz input

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Actual and reconstructed strains in gauge 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Actual and reconstructed strains in gauge 3




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In