Research Papers

Dual-Functional Energy-Harvesting and Vibration Control: Electromagnetic Resonant Shunt Series Tuned Mass Dampers

[+] Author and Article Information
Lei Zuo

e-mail: lei.zuo@stonybrook.edu

Wen Cui

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
State University of New York at Stony Brook,
Stony Brook, NY 11794

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. Manuscript received February 20, 2012; final manuscript received March 21, 2013; published online June 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Wei-Hsin Liao.

J. Vib. Acoust 135(5), 051018 (Jun 18, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: VIB-12-1042; doi: 10.1115/1.4024095 History: Received February 20, 2012; Revised March 21, 2013

This paper proposes a novel retrofittable approach for dual-functional energy-harvesting and robust vibration control by integrating the tuned mass damper (TMD) and electromagnetic shunted resonant damping. The viscous dissipative element between the TMD and primary system is replaced by an electromagnetic transducer shunted with a resonant RLC circuit. An efficient gradient based numeric method is presented for the parameter optimization in the control framework for vibration suppression and energy harvesting. A case study is performed based on the Taipei 101 TMD. It is found that by tuning the TMD resonance and circuit resonance close to that of the primary structure, the electromagnetic resonant-shunt TMD achieves the enhanced effectiveness and robustness of double-mass series TMDs, without suffering from the significantly amplified motion stroke. It is also observed that the parameters and performances optimized for vibration suppression are close to those optimized for energy harvesting, and the performance is not sensitive to the resistance of the charging circuit or electrical load.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kareem, A., Kijewski, T., and Tamura, Y., 1999, “Mitigation of Motions of Tall Buildings With Specific Examples of Recent Applications,” Wind Struct., 2(3), pp. 201–251.
Lackner, M. A., and Rotea, M. A., 2011, “Passive Structural Control of Offshore Wind Turbines,” Wind Energ., 14(3), pp. 373–388. [CrossRef]
Miyata, T., 2003, “Historical View of Long-Span Bridge Aerodynamics,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91, pp. 1393–1410. [CrossRef]
Tang, X., and Zuo, L., 2010, “Regenerative Semi-Active Control of Tall Building Vibration With Series TMDs,” Proceeding of America Control Conference, Baltimore, MD, June 30–July 2.
Tang, X., and Zuo, L., 2012, “Simulation and Experiment Validation of Simultaneous Vibration Control and Energy Harvesting From Buildings Via Tuned Mass Dampers,” Proceeding of America Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, June 29–July 1.
Ni, T., Zuo, L., and Kareem, A., 2011, “Assessment of Energy Potential and Vibration Mitigation of Regenerative Tuned Mass Dampers on Wind Excited Tall Buildings,” 2011 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Washington DC, August 28–31.
Lefeuvre, E., Audigier, D., Richard, C., and Guyomar, D., 2007, “Buck-Boost Converter for Sensorless Power Optimization of Piezoelectric Energy Harvester,” IEEE T. Power Electron., 22(5), pp. 2018–2025. [CrossRef]
Forward, R. L., 1979, “Electronic Damping of Vibrations in Optical Structures,” Appl. Opt., 18, pp. 690–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hagood, N. W. and von Flotow, A., 1991, “Damping of Structural Vibrations With Piezoelectric Materials and Passive Electrical Networks,” J. Sound Vib., 146(2), pp. 243–268. [CrossRef]
Moheimani, S. O. R., 2003, “A Survey of Recent Innovations in Vibration Damping and Control Using Shunted Piezoelectric Transducers,” IEEE Trans. Contr. Sys. Tech., 11(4), pp. 482–494. [CrossRef]
Lesieutre, G. A., 1998, “Vibration Damping and Control Using Shunted Piezoelectric Materials,” Shock Vib. Dig., 30(3), pp. 187–195. [CrossRef]
Behrens, S., Fleming, A. J., and Moheimani, S., 2003, “Electromagnetic Shunt Damping,” Proceedings of the IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM 2003), Kobe, Japan, July 20–24, pp. 1145–1150. [CrossRef]
Behrens, S., Fleming, A. J., and Moheimani, S., 2005, “Passive Vibration Control Via Electromagnetic Shunt Damping,” IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 10(1), pp. 118–122. [CrossRef]
Inoue, T., Ishida, Y., and Sumi, M., 2008, “Vibration Suppression Using Electromagnetic Resonant Shunt Damper,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 130(4), p. 041003. [CrossRef]
Den Hartog, J. P., 1947, Mechanical Vibration, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Zhang, X., Niu, H., and Yan, B., 2012, “A Novel Multimode Negative Inductance Negative Resistance Shunted Electromagnetic Damping and Its Application on a Cantilever Plate,” J. Sound Vib., 331(10), pp. 2257–2271. [CrossRef]
Yonemura, J., Kim, S., Mikami, H., Nagai, B., and Okada, Y., 1999, “Regenerative Control of Active Mass Type Vibration Damper,” Trans. Jap. Soc. Mech. Eng. C., 65(632), pp. 1374–1380 (in Japanese). [CrossRef]
Zuo, L., 2009, “Effective and Robust Vibration Control Using Series Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 131(3), p. 031003. [CrossRef]
Zhou, K., Doyle, J. C., and Glover, K., 1995, Robust and Optimal Control, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Zuo, L., and Nayfeh, S., 2005, “Optimization of the Individual Stiffness and Damping Parameters in Multiple-Tuned-Mass-Damper Systems,” ASME J. Vib. Acoust., 127(1), pp. 77–83. [CrossRef]
Bertsekas, D. P., 1995, Nonlinear Programming, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.
Haskett, T., Breukelman, B., Robinson, J., and Kottelenberg, J., 2004, “Tuned-Mass Damper Under Excessive Structural Excitation,” Report of the Motioneering Inc., Guelph, Ontario, Canada.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Classic TMD, (b) dual-functional TMD for energy harvesting and vibration control, where the damping c1 is implemented with an electromagnetic transducer shunted with a resistive circuit

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The proposed series TMD with electromagnetic resonant shunt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

(a) Double-mass series TMD, (b) the RMS stroke the double-mass series TMD is several times larger than the classic TMD or parallel TMDs [6]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The frequency responses of the classic TMD of mass ratio 1% with Den Hartog's tuning (dash) and electromagnetic shunt TMD of stiffness ratio 1% withtuning (solid) of Inoue et al. [14] compared with that of the primary without TMD (dot)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A vibration system with electromagnetic resonant shunt circuit is similar as a TMD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The modeling of electromagnetic shunt series TMD as a control problem, where the control force u1 is generated by the spring k1, and the control force u2 is produced by the electrical capacitor C and the resistor R

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The parameter optimization of the mechanical and electrical components in the framework of decentralized control

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The frequency responses of electromagnetic shunt series TMD for Taipei 101 Tower (solid) in comparison with double-mass TMD (dashed-dotted), classic TMD (dash), and system without TMD (dot), where all parameters are optimized to minimize the H2 norm from external force to the displacement of the primary system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The frequency response of the electromagnetic series TMD optimized for vibration suppression (solid) and optimized for energy harvesting (dash) for Taipei 101 Tower

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The linear power spectrum density (W/Hz) of harvested energy in electromagnetic series TMD system optimized for energy harvesting under white-noise force excitation (solid) and optimized for vibration suppression (dash) in comparison with the classic TMD (dashed-dotted) and double-mass series TMD (dot)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The frequency responses of the electromagnetic series TMD (left) and the classic TMD (right) after 5% changes of the tuning parameters (k1, C, R) or (k1, c1). The electromagnetic series TMD is more robust than the classic TMD.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Sensitivity of vibration suppression of the electromagnetic shunt series TMD for Taipei 101 to the changes of tuning parameters: stiffness k1 (solid), capacitor C (dash), and electrical load R (dot) under unit white-noise force excitation Fex

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Sensitivity of energy harvesting of the electromagnetic shunt series TMD for Taipei 101 to the changes of tuning parameters: stiffness k1 (solid), capacitor C (dash), and electrical load R (dot)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In