0
Research Papers

Energy Harvesting, Ride Comfort, and Road Handling of Regenerative Vehicle Suspensions

[+] Author and Article Information
Lei Zuo

e-mail: lei.zuo@stonybrook.edu

Pei-Sheng Zhang

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
State University of New York at Stony Brook,
Stony Brook, NY 11794-2300

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Design Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. Manuscript received March 31, 2011; final manuscript received July 14, 2012; published online February 4, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Wei-Hsin Liao.

J. Vib. Acoust 135(1), 011002 (Feb 04, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: VIB-11-1060; doi: 10.1115/1.4007562 History: Received March 31, 2011; Revised July 14, 2012

This paper presents a comprehensive assessment of the power that is available for harvesting in the vehicle suspension system and the tradeoff among energy harvesting, ride comfort, and road handing with analysis, simulations, and experiments. The excitation from road irregularity is modeled as a stationary random process with road roughness suggested in the ISO standard. The concept of system H2 norm is used to obtain the mean value of power generation and the root mean square values of vehicle body acceleration (ride quality) and dynamic tire-ground contact force (road handling). For a quarter car model, an analytical solution of the mean power is obtained. The influence of road roughness, vehicle speed, suspension stiffness, shock absorber damping, tire stiffness, and the wheel and chasses masses to the vehicle performances and harvestable power are studied. Experiments are carried out to verify the theoretical analysis. The results suggest that road roughness, tire stiffness, and vehicle driving speed have great influence on the harvesting power potential, where the suspension stiffness, absorber damping, and vehicle masses are insensitive. At 60 mph on good and average roads, 100–400 W average power is available in the suspensions of a middle-sized vehicle.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Quarter-car model with viscous damper (left) and quarter-car model with electromagnetic harvester (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Block diagram view of overall road-vehicle dynamics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Displacement analysis over vehicle speeds: on good road (dashed) and average road (solid)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Velocity analysis over vehicle speeds: on good road (dashed) and average road (solid)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Power potential in the suspension system of a typical passenger car at various vehicle speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Ride comfort at various vehicle speeds: on good road (dashed) and average road (solid)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Ride safety at various vehicle speeds on good road (dashed) and average road (solid)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effects of tire stiffness on vehicle performances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effects of tire-wheel mass on vehicle performances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effects of sprung mass on vehicle performances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Frequency response from ground to suspension velocities of nominal and perturbed vehicle system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effects of suspension damping on vehicle performances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effects of suspension stiffness on vehicle performances

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Systematic view of experiment setup: road test of a super compact vehicle on Stony Brook campus road

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Measured shock absorber displacements on a campus road at 25 mph. The RMS displacement is 4.6 mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Velocities of shock absorber compression and extension at vehicle speed of 25 mph on a campus road. The RMS velocity is 0.086 m/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Energy dissipation rate of one shock absorber at vehicle speed 25 mph on bitumen campus road, RMS = 14.6 W from one shock absorber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Measured suspension power (squared) of one shock absorber in a super compact vehicle on campus road and theoretical predicted power of one shock absorber in a middle size car on good (dashed) and average road (solid)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In