Research Papers

Propagation of Spacecraft Free-Interface Substructure Uncertainty Into System Test-Analysis Correlation

[+] Author and Article Information
Daniel C. Kammer

 Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin, 1500 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706kammer engr.wisc.edu

Dimitri Krattiger

 Department of Engineering Physics, University of Wisconsin, 1500 Engineering Dr., Madison, WI 53706

J. Vib. Acoust 134(5), 051014 (Sep 07, 2012) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4006644 History: Received November 16, 2010; Revised March 19, 2012; Published September 07, 2012; Online September 07, 2012

As space structures become larger and more complex, ground based vibration tests of the entire spacecraft become either problematic or impossible. Instead, the spacecraft is tested and validated only at the substructure level. The substructure tests are usually performed in a simulated free-free configuration for simplicity and accuracy. A methodology is presented for studying the effects of uncertainty on metrics used for test-analysis correlation of complex spacecraft that are validated on a substructure-by-substructure basis. The objective is to quantify the level of accuracy required at the substructure level to produce acceptable accuracy at the system level. This is done by propagating uncertainty in test-analysis correlation metrics from free-free substructure vibration tests into uncertainty in synthesized system correlation metrics. The correlation uncertainty in each substructure can either be prescribed, for the purpose of numerical experimentation, or it may be available from existing substructure test data. Linear covariance propagation is used to propagate the substructure modal matrix uncertainty into the uncertainty in the corresponding Craig-Bampton substructure representations. Linear covariance propagation is then used again to propagate the substructure uncertainties into the full system modal matrices. The uncertainties in the system correlation metrics are then extracted from the modal matrix uncertainties to determine the impact of uncertainty at the substructure level. Organizations, such as NASA and the Air Force, make critical decisions on spacecraft performance and survivability based on the results of test-analysis correlation metrics. In order to ensure the success of finite element model validation where there is no system level test, uncertainty in the substructures must be propagated into the system level correlation metrics. It is believed that the method presented in this paper offers a unique and efficient approach for the required uncertainty propagation.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Substructure 2 rms cross-orthogonality

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Substructure 2 rms modal mass uncertainty

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Substructure 2 rms modal stiffness uncertainty

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Propagated system rms modal mass uncertainty

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Propagated system rms modal stiffness uncertainty

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

System rms cross-orthogonality for first 20 elastic modes



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In