0
Technical Briefs

Vibration and Sensitivity Analysis of a Beam With a Lumped Mass of Translational and Rotary Inertias

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Wang1

Department of Aeronautical Structural Engineering,  Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710072, People’s Republic of Chinawangdng66@yahoo.com.cn

1

Corresponding author.

J. Vib. Acoust 134(3), 034502 (Apr 24, 2012) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005827 History: Received October 19, 2010; Revised December 06, 2011; Published April 23, 2012; Online April 24, 2012

The free vibration analysis of a uniform beam carrying a lumped mass with the inclusion of both translational and rotary inertias are performed, and a closed-form expression of the frequency sensitivity with respect to the attachment location of the lumped mass is formulated using the discrete method upon the finite element analysis. By virtually introducing additional degrees of freedom at the mass-attached point, the first-order derivative of the natural frequency can be determined straightforwardly. Comparisons of numerical results from two typical examples show that the rotary inertia of a lumped mass may impose important effects on the natural frequency and its sensitivity. Neglecting the rotary inertia may lead to inaccurate or even erroneous solutions of the beam’s dynamics.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

A uniform beam carrying a concentrated mass of both translational and rotary inertias

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

A finite beam element with an internal lumped-mass attachment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

The first two natural frequencies of a cantilever beam with a lumped mass of the translational inertia α = 0.4 and the rotary inertia β = 0.1 located at an arbitrary point along the beam

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Sensitivities of the first two frequencies of the cantilever beam with respect to the location of the lumped mass of the translational inertia α = 0.4 and the rotary inertia β = 0.1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison of the first two vibration mode shapes of a cantilever beam loaded with a lumped mass at the beam’s tip

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

A free uniform beam carrying two lumped masses

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In