0
Research Papers

A Time Domain Inverse Method for Identification of Random Acoustic Sources at Launch Vehicle Lift-Off

[+] Author and Article Information
B. Troclet

Department of Missile Structural Analysis, EADS ASTRIUM Space Transportation, 78133 Les Mureaux, France

S. Alestra, V. Srithammavanh, I. Terrasse

Department of Simulation Information Technology Systems Engineering, EADS Innovation Works, 92152 Suresnes, France

J. Vib. Acoust 133(2), 021010 (Mar 22, 2011) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4002124 History: Received November 02, 2008; Revised June 11, 2010; Published March 22, 2011; Online March 22, 2011

In order to characterize the lift-off acoustic environment of launch vehicles, EADS has developed an inverse method via a time domain boundary integral equation approach using an optimal control method. An industrial application of the method is presented via the identification of acoustic sources of ARIANE 5 from lift-off in-flight measurements. As the lift-off acoustic field is random in nature, the optimization process is performed using the cross-correlation functions matrix measurement. After having characterized the sources from pressure measurements, the complete environment is rebuilt by an acoustic direct computation from the obtained acoustic sources. We finally estimate the loads created by the acoustic field by integrating the resulting pressures over all surfaces of the launchers.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

ARIANE 5 and launch pad elements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Definition of the overpressure waves

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Effects of the overpressure and acoustic loads

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

BEM double layer matrix for time marching BEM scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Global scheme of the minimization process loop

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

ARIANE 5 flight 521 BEM mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Locations of acoustic sources

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Solid rocket booster source (source A)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Solid rocket booster source (launch duct exit and source B)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Comparison of the measured and computed pressure data (sensor 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Comparison of the measured and computed pressure data (sensor 3)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Comparison of the measured and computed difference in pressure data (sensors 1 and 3)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Comparison of the measured/computed difference in pressure (sensors 12 and 10)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Comparison of the measured and computed cross-correlation (sensors 4 and 10)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In