0
Research Papers

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Friction-Wedge Dampers During Suspension Pitch Modes

[+] Author and Article Information
Y. Q. Sun

Centre for Railway Engineering, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australiay.q.sun@cqu.edu.au

C. Cole

Centre for Railway Engineering, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, Queensland 4702, Australiac.cole@cqu.edu.au

J. Vib. Acoust 130(2), 021003 (Jan 30, 2008) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2827369 History: Received November 15, 2006; Revised August 20, 2007; Published January 30, 2008

A two-dimensional finite element model has been developed to investigate the friction damping characteristics of suspensions with so-called “constant-damping” friction wedges widely used in three-piece bogie wagons in Australia. The model was used to simulate the suspension during pitch modes. The simulation results show that the friction damping force in the suspension pitch modes is dependent on the friction conditions on the wedge contact surfaces, wagon speed, and the wedge shape and elasticity effects including the stuck state. The suspension pitch movements of a three-piece bogie with dry friction wedges can cause wedge rotation and partial separation of wedge contacting surfaces, which seriously affects the wedge friction damping effectiveness. The curved shape of wedge angular surface can significantly improve the friction damping characteristics of three-piece bogie suspensions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Constant-damping suspension

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Top surface irregularity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Simulation results for a case study (WFC=0.3)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Wedge friction conditions: (a) WFC=0.2 and (b) WFC=0.1

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Wagon speed: (a) at 30km∕h and (b) at 100km∕h

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Simulation results: (a) 30km∕h, (b) 60km∕h, (c) 100km∕h, (d) 60km∕h, and (e) 60km∕h

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In