Prediction of Dry-Friction Whirl and Whip Between a Rotor and a Stator

[+] Author and Article Information
Dara W. Childs

Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843dchilds@tamu.edu

Avijit Bhattacharya

Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843avijitbh@gmail.com

J. Vib. Acoust 129(3), 355-362 (Jan 30, 2007) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2731412 History: Received September 11, 2006; Revised January 30, 2007

This paper addresses recent test results for dry-friction whip and whirl. Authors of these publications suggest that predictions from Black’s 1968 paper (J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 10(1), pp. 1–12) are deficient in predicting their observed transition speeds from whirl to whip and the associated precession frequencies of whirl and whip motion. Predictions from Black’s simple Jeffcott-rotor/point-mass stator are cited. This model is extended here to a multimode rotor and stator model with an arbitrary axial location for rotor-stator rubbing. Predictions obtained from this new model are quite close to experimental observations in terms of the transition from whip to whirl and observed precession frequencies. Paradoxically, nonlinear numerical simulations using Black’s model fail to produce the whirl and whip solutions. The Coulomb friction force in Black’s model has a fixed direction, and Bartha showed in 2000 (“Dry Friction Backward Whirl of Rotors,” Dissertation, THE No. 13817, ETH Zurich) that by making the friction-force direction depend on the relative sliding velocity, nonlinear simulations would produce the predicted whirl solutions. He also showed that Black’s proposed whip solution at the upper precession-frequency transition from whirl to whip was unstable. The multimode extension of Black’s model predicts a complicated range of whirl and whip possibilities; however, nonlinear time-transient simulations (including the sgn function definition for the Coulomb force) only produce the initial whirl precession range, initial whirl-whip transition, and initial whip frequency. Simulation results for these values agree well with predictions. However, none of the predicted higher-frequency whirl results are obtained. Also, the initial whip frequency persists to quite high running speeds and does not (as predicted) transition to higher frequencies. Hence, despite its deficiencies, correct and very useful predictions are obtained from a reasonable extension of Black’s model.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Jeffcott rotor model interacting with a point-mass stator across a clearance from (11)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Rotor-stator interaction motion

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Simple rotor with mid and quarter span contact setup (not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Prediction for simple shaft model at midspan of the shaft as shown in Fig. 3

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Prediction for simple shaft model at quarter span of the shaft as shown in Fig. 3

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

The Yu rotor-stator model with noncentered contact location (based on figures in (8-9) and not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Experimental plots from Yu (8) and Bently (9)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Prediction for the Yu model (8)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Simple layout of Bartha’s rotor stator model (modeled based on figures in (6) and not to scale)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Prediction for Bartha’s (6-7) model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Reduction in whirl and whip frequencies not predicted using Black’s (1-2) analysis




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In