0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Auxiliary Bearing Life Prediction Using Hertzian Contact Bearing Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Guangyoung Sun

 NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Lewis Field, 21000 Brookpark Rd, MS 301-5, Cleveland, OH 44135guangdol@hotmail.com

J. Vib. Acoust 128(2), 203-209 (Sep 09, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2159036 History: Received December 12, 2004; Revised September 09, 2005

A rotating machine with active magnetic bearings (AMBs) requires conventional bearings as a backup support system in the case of AMB failure. This paper presents an estimated auxiliary/catcher bearing (CB) L10 fatigue life based on the Hertzian contact dynamic loads between bearing ball and races during the touchdown. The thermal growths of bearing components are predicted using a one-dimensional thermal model, and the resulting expansions contribute to the calculation for the Hertzian contact loads. Numerical simulations for an energy-storage flywheel module reveal that a high-speed backward whirl significantly reduces the CB life and that an optimal damping lowers the CB temperature and increases the CB life.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Cross-sectioned ball bearing with groove centers p,q

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

(a) Bearing reference coordinate and (b) inner-race groove reference center

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Displacements of ball, inner, and outer races

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Cross-sectioned bearing with thermal nodes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Energy storage flywheel with magnetic suspensions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Auxiliary support system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Nondimensional (a) peak rotor/CB normal contact force and (b) minimum air gap versus μd: nominal fpeak=997N, nominal air gap=0.254mm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

(a) CB life in hour and (b) maximum ball stress versus μd

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Thermal growths versus μd (엯, case I; ◻, case III): (a) TLe, (b) Ti, (c) Tb, and (d) Te

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Nondimensional (a) peak rotor/CB contact force and (b) minimum air gap versus oil viscosity: nominal fpeak=997N, nominal air gap=0.254mm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

(a) CB life in hour and (b) ball stress versus oil viscosity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Thermal growths versus oil viscosity: (a) TLe, (b) Ti, (c) Tb, and (d) Te

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In