0
TECHNICAL BRIEFS

Experimental Robustness Analysis of Magneto-Rheological Tuned Vibration Absorbers Subject to Mass Off-Tuning

[+] Author and Article Information
Jeong-Hoi Koo1

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering,  Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056koo@muohio.edu

Mehdi Ahmadian

 Center for Vehicle Systems and Safety Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0238ahmadian@vt.edu

Mehdi Setareh

College of Architecture and Urban Studies,  Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060–0205setareh@vt.edu

1

Corresponding author.

J. Vib. Acoust 128(1), 126-131 (May 24, 2005) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2128647 History: Received April 08, 2004; Revised May 24, 2005

This paper offers an experimental robustness analysis of a semi-active tuned vibration absorber (TVA) subject to structural mass off-tuning, which occurs frequently in practical applications of TVAs. One of the critical problems of a conventional TVA is off-tuning or miss-tuning because off-tuned TVAs may amplify the vibrations of the primary structure. This study intends to evaluate how well semi-active TVAs are able to adapt to structural mass changes (mass off-tuning) as compared with passive TVAs. To this end, a test apparatus was built to represent a two-degree-of-freedom structure model coupled with a TVA. The semi-active TVA considered in this study employed a magneto-rheological (MR) damper as its damping element to enhance overall performance. Using this test apparatus, a series of tests were conducted to identify the optimal tuning parameters of the TVAs. After obtaining each TVA’s optimal tuning parameters based on equal peak transmissibility criteria, the mass off-tuning tests were then performed on the optimally tuned TVAs. In order to off-tune the system, the mass of the primary structure varied from 19% to +19% of its nominal mass using a set of steel plates. Overall, the experimental results show that the semi-active MR TVA outperforms the passive TVA in reducing maximum vibrations. Moreover, the results show that the semi- active TVA is more robust to changes in the primary mass (mass off-tuning) The results further show that the semi-active MR TVA offers larger performance gains as the structure mass increases.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Lumped-parameter models of semi-active TVAs

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Experimental setup and its primary components

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

The magneto-rheological damper and its damping force envelope

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Schematic of data acquisition

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Removing mass from the Structure: (a) Passive TVA and (b) semi-active TVA

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Adding mass to the structure: (a) Passive TVA and (b) Semi-active TVA

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Peak transmissibility reduction over the passive TVA

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In