A Comparative Study and Analysis of Semi-Active Vibration-Control Systems

Nader Jalili

doi:10.1115/1.1500336

Journal of Vibration and Acoustics | Volume 124 | Issue 4 | TECHNICAL PAPERS

< Previous Article Next Article >

TECHNICAL PAPERS

A Comparative Study and Analysis of Semi-Active Vibration-Control Systems

Nader Jalili, Mem. ASME, Assistant Professor

[+] Author and Article Information

Nader Jalili

Robotics and Mechatronics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634-0921e-mail: jalili@clemson.edu

J. Vib. Acoust 124(4), 593-605 (Sep 20, 2002) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1500336 History: Received May 01, 2001; Revised April 01, 2002; Online September 20, 2002

Article

References

Figures

Citing Articles

Purchase this Content

$25.00

Purchase

Learn about subscription and purchase options

Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Schematic of (a) force transmissibility for foundation isolation, (b) displacement transmissibility for protecting device from vibration of the base, and (c) application of vibration absorber for suppressing primary system vibration

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

A typical primary structure equipped with three versions of vibration-control systems: (a) passive, (b) active, and (c) semi-active configuration

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Application of a semi-active absorber to SDOF primary system with adjustable stiffness k_a and damping c_a

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

PCB series 712 PZT inertial actuator (left), schematic of operation (middle), and a simple SDOF mathematical model (right) (from 16)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Frequency transfer functions (FTF) for nominal absorber (thin-solid); de-tuned absorber (thin-dashed); and re-tuned absorber (thick-solid) settings (from 15)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Frequency response plot of transmissibility T_A for the semi-active isolator as a function of variable damping ratio

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Frequency response plot of transmissibility T_A for optimum semi-active suspension as a function of variable damping ratio

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

A schematic configuration of an ER damper (from 19)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

A schematic configuration of an MR damper

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

The application of a variable stiffness vibration absorber to a 4DOF building (from 44)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

A semi-active flutter control using adjustable pitching stiffness (from 45)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

A typical primary system equipped with the double-ended cantilever absorber with adjustable tuning ratio through moving masses m (from 46).

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Schematic of the adjustable effective inertia vibration absorber (from 47)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Schematic of a cantilever beam with SA piezoelectric RL network (from 13)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

(a) A SQC model of vehicle suspension system (b) half car model incorporating the body pitch (from 58), and (c) whole car model with heave, pitch, and roll motions (from 58)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Schematic design of the electro-hydraulic valve in the piston of a semi-active damper (from 57)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Variations in frequency response of body velocity for SQC model with variable damper (from 17)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Variation of normalized PI as a function of variable suspension damping ratio (from 10)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Variations in frequency response of body velocity for SQC model with combination of variable damper and skyhook damping (from 17)

View Large | Save Figure | Download Slide (.ppt)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Web of Science® Times Cited: 65

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

PDF
Email

You must be logged in as an individual user to share content.

Return to: A Comparative Study and Analysis of Semi-Active Vibration-Control Systems

Copyright in the material you requested is held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Privacy Policy for further information.
Share
Get Citation

Jalili N. A Comparative Study and Analysis of Semi-Active Vibration-Control Systems. ASME. J. Vib. Acoust. 2002;124(4):593-605. doi:10.1115/1.1500336.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

© Copyright
Get Alerts

Processing your request... Please Wait.

A Comparative Study and Analysis of Semi-Active Vibration-Control Systems

References

Figures

Schematic of (a) force transmissibility for foundation isolation, (b) displacement transmissibility for protecting device from vibration of the base, and (c) application of vibration absorber for suppressing primary system vibration

A typical primary structure equipped with three versions of vibration-control systems: (a) passive, (b) active, and (c) semi-active configuration

Application of a semi-active absorber to SDOF primary system with adjustable stiffness k_a and damping c_a

PCB series 712 PZT inertial actuator (left), schematic of operation (middle), and a simple SDOF mathematical model (right) (from 16)

Frequency transfer functions (FTF) for nominal absorber (thin-solid); de-tuned absorber (thin-dashed); and re-tuned absorber (thick-solid) settings (from 15)

Frequency response plot of transmissibility T_A for the semi-active isolator as a function of variable damping ratio

Frequency response plot of transmissibility T_A for optimum semi-active suspension as a function of variable damping ratio

A schematic configuration of an ER damper (from 19)

A schematic configuration of an MR damper

The application of a variable stiffness vibration absorber to a 4DOF building (from 44)

A semi-active flutter control using adjustable pitching stiffness (from 45)

A typical primary system equipped with the double-ended cantilever absorber with adjustable tuning ratio through moving masses m (from 46).

Schematic of the adjustable effective inertia vibration absorber (from 47)

Schematic of a cantilever beam with SA piezoelectric RL network (from 13)

(a) A SQC model of vehicle suspension system (b) half car model incorporating the body pitch (from 58), and (c) whole car model with heave, pitch, and roll motions (from 58)

Schematic design of the electro-hydraulic valve in the piston of a semi-active damper (from 57)

Variations in frequency response of body velocity for SQC model with variable damper (from 17)

Variation of normalized PI as a function of variable suspension damping ratio (from 10)

A 2DOF vehicle model with dynamic vibration absorber

On-off semi-active control decision

Schematic of Skyhook damper arrangement

Variations in frequency response of body velocity for SQC model with combination of variable damper and skyhook damping (from 17)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

A Comparative Study and Analysis of Semi-Active Vibration-Control Systems

References

Figures

Schematic of (a) force transmissibility for foundation isolation, (b) displacement transmissibility for protecting device from vibration of the base, and (c) application of vibration absorber for suppressing primary system vibration

A typical primary structure equipped with three versions of vibration-control systems: (a) passive, (b) active, and (c) semi-active configuration

Application of a semi-active absorber to SDOF primary system with adjustable stiffness ka and damping ca

PCB series 712 PZT inertial actuator (left), schematic of operation (middle), and a simple SDOF mathematical model (right) (from 16)

Frequency transfer functions (FTF) for nominal absorber (thin-solid); de-tuned absorber (thin-dashed); and re-tuned absorber (thick-solid) settings (from 15)

Frequency response plot of transmissibility TA for the semi-active isolator as a function of variable damping ratio

Frequency response plot of transmissibility TA for optimum semi-active suspension as a function of variable damping ratio

A schematic configuration of an ER damper (from 19)

A schematic configuration of an MR damper

The application of a variable stiffness vibration absorber to a 4DOF building (from 44)

A semi-active flutter control using adjustable pitching stiffness (from 45)

A typical primary system equipped with the double-ended cantilever absorber with adjustable tuning ratio through moving masses m (from 46).

Schematic of the adjustable effective inertia vibration absorber (from 47)

Schematic of a cantilever beam with SA piezoelectric RL network (from 13)

(a) A SQC model of vehicle suspension system (b) half car model incorporating the body pitch (from 58), and (c) whole car model with heave, pitch, and roll motions (from 58)

Schematic design of the electro-hydraulic valve in the piston of a semi-active damper (from 57)

Variations in frequency response of body velocity for SQC model with variable damper (from 17)

Variation of normalized PI as a function of variable suspension damping ratio (from 10)

A 2DOF vehicle model with dynamic vibration absorber

On-off semi-active control decision

Schematic of Skyhook damper arrangement

Variations in frequency response of body velocity for SQC model with combination of variable damper and skyhook damping (from 17)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related Content

Journals

Conference Proceedings

eBooks

Application of a semi-active absorber to SDOF primary system with adjustable stiffness k_a and damping c_a

Frequency response plot of transmissibility T_A for the semi-active isolator as a function of variable damping ratio

Frequency response plot of transmissibility T_A for optimum semi-active suspension as a function of variable damping ratio