0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Some Pitfalls of Simplified Modeling for Viscoelastic Sandwich Beams

[+] Author and Article Information
Eric M. Austin, Daniel J. Inman

Center for Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, Mail Code 0261, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061

J. Vib. Acoust 122(4), 434-439 (Mar 01, 2000) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1287030 History: Received May 01, 1999; Revised March 01, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Topics: Damping , Modeling
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Austin,  E. M., 1999, “Variations on Modeling of Constrained-Layered Damping Treatments,” Shock Vibr. Dig., 31, No. 4, pp. 275–280.
Kerwin,  E. M., 1959, “Damping of Flexural Waves by a Constrained Visco-Elastic Layer,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 31, pp. 952–962.
DiTaranto,  R. A., 1965, “Theory of Vibratory Bending for Elastic and Viscoelastic Layered Finite-Length Beams.” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 32, pp. 881–886.
Mead,  D. J., and Markus,  S., 1969, “The Forced Vibration of a Three-Layer, Damped Sandwich Beam with Arbitrary Boundary Conditions,” ASME J. Vibr. Acoust., 10, No. 2, pp. 163–175.
Nakra,  B. C., 1976, “Vibration Control With Viscoelastic Materials,” Shock Vibr. Dig., 8, No. 6, pp. 3–12.
Nakra,  B. C., 1981, “Vibration Control With Viscoelastic Materials-II,” Shock Vibr. Dig., 13, No. 1, pp. 17–20.
Nakra,  B. C., 1984, “Vibration Control With Viscoelastic Materials-III,” Shock Vibr. Dig., 16, No. 5, pp. 17–22.
Torvik, P. J., 1980, “The Analysis and Design of Constrained Layer Damping Treatments,” Proceedings ASME Winter Annual Meeting—Damping Applications for Vibration Control, pp. 85–112.
Mead,  D. J., 1982, “A Comparison of Some Equations for the Flexural Vibration of Damped Sandwich Beams,” J. Sound Vib., 83, No. 3, pp. 363–377.
Douglas,  B. E., and Yang,  J. C. S., 1978, “Transverse Compressional Damping in the Vibratory Response of Elastic-Viscoelastic-Elastic Beams,” AIAA J., 16, No. 9, pp. 925–930.
Ungar,  E. E., and Kerwin,  E. M., 1962, “Loss Factors of Visoelastic Systems in Terms of Energy Concepts,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34, pp. 954–957.
Johnson,  C. D., Kienholz,  D. A., and Rogers,  L. C., 1981, “Finite Element Prediction of Damping in Beams With Constrained Viscoelastic Layers,” Shock Vibr. Bul., 51, No. 1, pp. 71–81.
Ikegami, R., Beck, C. J., and Walker, W. J., 1984, “Application of Damping to Improve Reliability of IUS-Type Satellite Equipment—RELSAT Program,” Vibration Damping 1984 Workshop Proceedings, pp. TT1–TT15.
Staley, J. A., and Stahle, C. V., 1984, “Damping in Support Structures for Satellite Equipment Reliability—RELSAT,” Vibration Damping 1984 Workshop Proceedings, pp. UU1–UU26.
Johnson,  C. D., 1995, “Design of Passive Damping Systems,” J. Mech. Design. J. Vibr. Acoust., 117(B), pp. 171–176, ASME 50th Anniversary of the Design Engineering Division.
Miles, R. N., 1984, “Beam Dampers for Skin Vibration and Noise Reduction in the 747,” Vibration Damping 1984 Workshop Proceedings, pp. PP1–PP18.
Saito,  H., and Tani,  H., 1984, “Vibrations of Bonded Beams With a Single Lap Adhesive Joint,” J. Sound Vib., 92, No. 2, pp. 299–309.
Rao,  M. D., and He,  S., 1992, “Vibration Analysis of Adhesively Bonded Lap Joint, Part II: Numerical Solution,” J. Sound Vib., 153, No. 3, pp. 417–425.
Garrison,  M. R., Miles,  R. N., Sun,  J. Q., and Bao,  W., 1994, “Random Response of a Plate Partially Covered by a Constrained Layer Damper,” J. Sound Vib., 172, No. 2, pp. 231–245.
Taylor,  T. W., and Nayfeh,  A. H., 1994, “Natural Frequencies of Thick, Layered Composite Plates,” Composites Eng., 4, No. 10, pp. 1011–1021.
Lee,  B.-C., and Kim,  K.-J., 1997, “Effects of Normal Strain in Core Material on Modal Property of Sandwich Plates,” ASME J. Vibr. Acoust., 119, pp. 493–503.
Miles,  R. N., and Reinhall,  P. G., 1986, “An Analytical Model for the Vibration of Laminated Beams Including the Effects of Both Shear and Thickness Deformation in the Adhesive Layer,” J. Sound Vib., 108, pp. 56–64.
Austin, E. M., 1998, “Influences of Higher Order Modeling Techniques on the Analysis of Layered Viscoelastic Damping Treatments,” Ph.D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Morgenthaler, D. R., 1991, “The Absolute Value Modal Strain Energy Method,” Damping ’91, Vol. II, pp. FDB1–FDB16.
Austin, E. M., and Inman, D. J., 1998, “Modeling of Sandwich Structures,” SPIE’s 5th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Vol. 3327, Passive Damping and Isolation.
Baz,  A., and Ro,  J., 1995, “Optimum Design and Control of Active Constrained Layer Damping,” J. Mech. Design J. Vibr. Acoust., 117(B), pp. 135–144, ASME 50th Anniversary Design Engineering Division.
Reddy, J. N., 1993, An Introduction to the Finite Element Method, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill.
Robbins,  D. H., and Reddy,  J. N., 1993, “Modelling of Thick Composites Using A Layerwise Laminate Theory,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 36, No. 4, pp. 655–677.
Pagano,  N. J., 1969, “Exact Solutions for Composite Laminates in Cylindrical Bending,” J. Compos. Mater., 3, pp. 398–411.
Sperling, L. H., 1992, Introduction to Physical Polymer Science, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Predictions of modal loss by real and complex analyses for a typical (for this study) sandwich beam with 25 percent coverage
Grahic Jump Location
Degrees of freedom for the Mead and Markus model
Grahic Jump Location
Error in predictions of modal strain energy vs. percent coverage for the first three modes using the Mead-Markus approach
Grahic Jump Location
First mode (symmetric boundary condition) for 100 percent coverage (50/125) with and without the assumption of equal transverse displacements
Grahic Jump Location
First mode (symmetric boundary condition) for 25 percent coverage (50/125) with and without the assumption of equal transverse displacements
Grahic Jump Location
Second mode for 75 percent coverage (50/125) with and without the assumption of equal transverse displacements
Grahic Jump Location
Third mode (symmetric boundary condition) for 50 percent coverage (50/125) with and without the assumption of equal transverse displacements
Grahic Jump Location
Third mode (symmetric boundary condition) for 75 percent coverage (50/125) with and without the assumption of equal transverse displacements
Grahic Jump Location
Difference in mode 1 MSE predicted with C0-20 element assuming Poisson’s ratio ν=0.3 and ν=0.4999 vs. percent coverage
Grahic Jump Location
MSE components in mode 1 vs. percent coverage 127-mm-long beam and ν=0.4999

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In